ArticleNature methods2026
Times are changing but order matters: transferable prediction of small-molecule liquid chromatography retention times.
Article in Nature methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid chromatography is a predominant technology for the separation of small molecules. Hundreds of retention time prediction models have been published over the past decades, yet truly transferable prediction (requiring no training data from the target chromatographic system) remains an open challenge. Unfortunately, retention times may change massively, even for nominally identical chromatographic conditions. Retention order is considerably more conserved; but even retention order may change if chromatographic conditions vary. Here we present 2-step, a two-step method for the prediction of retention times in reversed-phase chromatography. In the first step, a machine-learning model predicts a retention order index, taking into account chromatographic conditions. In the second step, we map predicted indices to absolute retention times. Disentangling these two tasks finally enables transferable retention time prediction across chromatographic conditions and compound classes, without requiring any target-system training data. Our 2-step method outperforms existing methods that were trained on the target dataset. Finally, we systematically study what chromatographic conditions result in notable changes of retention order.
Identifiers
42823457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.