Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823457›Full record

ArticleNature methods2026

Times are changing but order matters: transferable prediction of small-molecule liquid chromatography retention times.

Fleming Kretschmer, Eva-Maria Harrieder, Michael Witting, Sebastian Böcker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fleming Kretschmer *Chair for Bioinformatics, Institute for Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8523-6546
Eva-Maria Harrieder *Research Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Michael WittingResearch Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-4426
Sebastian BöckerChair for Bioinformatics, Institute for Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany. sebastian.boecker@uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9304-8091

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BO 1910/23Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) MW 4382/10-1Thüringer Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Digitale Gesellschaft (Thuringian Ministry of Economics, Science and Digital Society) DigLeben 5575/10-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid chromatography is a predominant technology for the separation of small molecules. Hundreds of retention time prediction models have been published over the past decades, yet truly transferable prediction (requiring no training data from the target chromatographic system) remains an open challenge. Unfortunately, retention times may change massively, even for nominally identical chromatographic conditions. Retention order is considerably more conserved; but even retention order may change if chromatographic conditions vary. Here we present 2-step, a two-step method for the prediction of retention times in reversed-phase chromatography. In the first step, a machine-learning model predicts a retention order index, taking into account chromatographic conditions. In the second step, we map predicted indices to absolute retention times. Disentangling these two tasks finally enables transferable retention time prediction across chromatographic conditions and compound classes, without requiring any target-system training data. Our 2-step method outperforms existing methods that were trained on the target dataset. Finally, we systematically study what chromatographic conditions result in notable changes of retention order.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.