Articlenpj metabolic health and disease2026
A digital twin for tracking and forecasting glycemia with septic patients in ICUs.
Article in npj metabolic health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a digital twin framework for real-time glucose monitoring and forecasting in septic patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). The framework integrates advanced machine learning models trained on continuous glucose measurements with a dynamic digital twin workflow that enables rapid deployment to individual patients, ongoing model assessment, updating with newly acquired data, and personalized predictive decision support. Built on a foundation model-a pretrained time-series transformer-the digital twin adapts as new patient data become available and generates rolling near-term glucose forecasts in real time. To evaluate adaptability and computational efficiency, we deployed the pretrained model to ten septic patients and compared multiple personalization strategies, including zero-shot inference, linear probing, full fine-tuning, and staged fine-tuning. The results show that the model can be initialized and personalized for a new patient within seconds on a standard laptop while maintaining accurate glucose forecasts across varying data conditions. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of real-time digital twin personalization in resource-constrained, high-acuity clinical environments and highlight the potential of digital twins as scalable, AI-enabled platforms for continuous physiological monitoring, clinical decision support, and individualized treatment design in the ICU.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.