Trial reportNature communications2026
Efficacy of everolimus and letrozole with or without ribociclib in recurrent endometrial cancer: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03008408 (A Phase II, Randomized Two-Arm Study of Everolimus and Letrozole, +/- Ribociclib), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II, Randomized Two-Arm Study of Everolimus and Letrozole, +/- Ribociclib (LEE011) in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this phase II trial, patients with endometrial cancer (EC) were randomized to everolimus/letrozole with (experimental arm) or without ribociclib (control arm) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03008408). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included toxicity, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). For all-comers, there was no difference in PFS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.4-1.4, p = 0.38), OS (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.5, p = 0.46), ORR (44.1% vs 25.7%, p = 0.11), or toxicity-related treatment discontinuation (4 [8.6%] vs 3 [11.4%], p = 0.22). Among those with prior endocrine therapy, ORR was higher in the experimental arm (61.5% vs 0.0%, p < 0.001). Within the experimental arm, CTNNB1
Indexed as
Identifiers
42823426What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.