ArticleBDJ open2026
Cytotoxicity, antibacterial efficacy, and fluoride content of commercial herbal toothpastes.
Article in BDJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluated fluoride concentration, antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans, and cytotoxicity of commercially available herbal toothpastes to assess their safety and clinical potential. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifteen herbal toothpastes were tested. Fluoride concentration was measured using a fluoride ion-selective electrode. Antibacterial activity against S. mutans was assessed by agar diffusion, and cytotoxicity was evaluated using the MTT assay in L929 fibroblasts and human gingival fibroblasts. Antibacterial and cytotoxicity data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD test, fluoride concentrations using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and associations among the three outcomes using Spearman's rank correlation.
resultsFluoride concentrations varied considerably, with 66.67% of products containing less than 600 ppm and only 20% reaching approximately 1500 ppm. Most products did not clearly indicate fluoride type or concentration on their labels. Strong antibacterial activity, with inhibition zones of 2.12-2.18 cm comparable to vancomycin, was observed in 26.67% of samples (p < 0.05). LC₅₀ values ranged from 0.715 to 9.410, and four formulations showed high cytotoxicity (p < 0.05). Antibacterial activity was inversely correlated with the LC₅₀ of L929 cells (rs = -0.579, p < 0.001) and of human gingival fibroblasts (rs = -0.328, p < 0.05), whereas fluoride concentration showed no association with greater cytotoxicity.
conclusionsHerbal toothpastes with strong antibacterial effects often showed moderate to high cytotoxicity. Formulations containing biocompatible ingredients, antioxidants, and adequate fluoride may provide a safer balance, highlighting the need for clearer labeling and optimized ingredient concentrations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.