ArticleBMJ open2026
Tirzepatide safety in EudraVigilance: descriptive and disproportionality analysis of preferred terms related to suboptimal treatment outcomes and drug-use-related issues.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAs obesity and diabetes are on the verge of an alarming growth, so is the use of tirzepatide, a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (RA) and currently the most effective weight loss-drug. This research aimed to identify reporting patterns related to suboptimal therapeutic outcomes and tirzepatide-related drug-use issues, mining the EudraVigilance (EV).
designRetrospective pharmacovigilance study using descriptive and disproportionality analyses of reports retrieved from the EV database. SETTINGS: Analysis of individual case safety reports involving tirzepatide in comparison with other GLP-1 RAs in the overall dataset (healthcare professionals (HP) and non-HP reports combined) and in the HP group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reporting ORs (RORs) with 95% CIs for selected Preferred Terms (PT) related to drug-use issues.
resultsAmong all analysed PTs, the most frequently reported were 'Off-label use' (n=1521), 'Drug ineffective' (n=425) and 'Off-label use device' (n=99). PTs in HP reports showed lower reporting odds compared with non-HP reports. In the overall dataset, reports involving tirzepatide showed lower reporting odds of the PT 'Drug ineffective' than those involving liraglutide (ROR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.70), dulaglutide (ROR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.82), exenatide (ROR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.92) and semaglutide (ROR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.91). However, in HP reports, no difference in reporting odds was observed between tirzepatide and semaglutide. A different pattern was observed for 'off-label use' in the full dataset, with higher reporting odds for tirzepatide vs lixisenatide, dulaglutide and liraglutide, but lower reporting odds vs semaglutide (ROR 0.52, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.55). In contrast, a higher reporting odd for the PT 'off-label use of device' was observed for tirzepatide versus semaglutide (ROR 43.47, 95% CI 16.00 to 118.13) in the overall reports; however, this finding should be interpreted with caution given the wide CI.
conclusionsThis study complements existing evidence from clinical trials and current clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.