Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42823088›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026

Toripalimab consolidation after chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a phase II, randomized controlled study (GASTO-1052A).

Pengxin Zhang, DaQuan Wang, Wenzhuo He, HongMei Zhang, Yumei Dong, Yu Situ, MengRu Wang, Yujiao Zhang, ShiHong Wei, Bo Qiu and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pengxin ZhangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1771-2991
DaQuan WangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Wenzhuo HeSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
HongMei ZhangThe Air Force Hospital of Southern Theater Command of PLA, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yumei DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Yu SituSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
MengRu WangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yujiao ZhangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
ShiHong WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, China liuhuisysucc@126.com huangyan@sysucc.org.cn qiubo@sysucc.org.cn 18919168488@163.com.
Bo QiuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China liuhuisysucc@126.com huangyan@sysucc.org.cn qiubo@sysucc.org.cn 18919168488@163.com.
Yan HuangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China liuhuisysucc@126.com huangyan@sysucc.org.cn qiubo@sysucc.org.cn 18919168488@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1789-5088
Hui LiuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China liuhuisysucc@126.com huangyan@sysucc.org.cn qiubo@sysucc.org.cn 18919168488@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3335-3756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have demonstrated survival benefits in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The integration of immunotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) may improve survival outcomes in limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). This phase II randomized controlled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab consolidation versus observation in patients with LS-SCLC after CCRT.

methodsWe conducted this phase II, randomized controlled trial in patients with LS-SCLC who had completed CCRT. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to either toripalimab consolidation (240 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 months) or observation. Randomization was stratified according to disease stage (I or II vs III) and the receipt of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) (yes vs no). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate and toxicities.

resultsBetween June 30, 2020, and May 31, 2024, a total of 98 patients were randomized to receive either toripalimab consolidation (n=49) or observation (n=49) after CCRT. The trial was prematurely terminated on May 31, 2024. Objective responses were observed in 14 of 23 patients (60.9%) in the toripalimab group and in 9 of 24 patients (37.5%) in the observation group. The median PFS was not reached in the toripalimab group, compared with 14.1 months (95% CI 2.8 to 25.4) in the observation group (HR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.96). The median OS was not reached with toripalimab, compared with 30.3 months (95% CI 20.4 to 40.2) with observation (HR, 0.39; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.80). Treatment-related toxicities were generally mild. Adverse events led to discontinuation of study drug in 6 of 48 patients (12.5%) in the toripalimab group. Grade 3 pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis occurred in two patient (4.2%) in the toripalimab group and one patient (2.0%) in the observation group. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred in either group. Subgroup analyses of PFS and OS favored toripalimab over observation across all predefined subgroups, including age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, smoking status, disease stage, response to CCRT and the receipt of PCI.

conclusionConsolidative toripalimab showed promising signals of improved PFS and OS with a manageable safety profile in patients with LS-SCLC. These findings warrant confirmation in larger, adequately powered randomized trials.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyConsolidation ChemotherapyLung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedtoripalimabImmune Checkpoint InhibitorLung Cancer

Identifiers

PMID42823088
PMCPMC13629860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.