ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Machine learning methodology using a masked neural network for robust genetic risk score calculation from noisy and missing data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGenetic risk scores (GRSs) are summaries of genetic data that can improve prediction of disease risk and progression. GRSs are increasing available but rely on high-quality input data to produce good output results; with noisy or missing inputs the GRS may be inaccurate. We aimed to develop a method to produce a robust estimate of the GRS when input data are missing, noisy or both. APPROACH: We developed a neural network approach, named masked-multi-layer perceptron (MLP), for robust GRS calculation trained on a set of GRS scores calculated on clean data. The masked-MLP includes additional input data and has noise inserted during training, both which make the model more robust.
resultsA GRS for type 1 diabetes (T1D) calculated on input data with 10% of the data corrupted had a Spearman rank correlation to the clean GRS of 0.669 (0.665-0.674) while the equivalent for the masked-MLP was 0.951 (0.950-0.952). For the same data, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for separation of T1D from population samples fell from 0.919 (0.904-0.932) to 0.808 (0.787-0.827) for the GRS while the masked-MLP fell to 0.910 (0.895-0.924).
conclusionsThe masked-MLP was more robust to noise when calculating a GRS than using standard approaches. Our approach has the potential to enable GRS calculations which are more robust to noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.