Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42822863›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Machine learning methodology using a masked neural network for robust genetic risk score calculation from noisy and missing data.

Steven Squires, Michael N Weedon, Richard A Oram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven SquiresClinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, EX1 2LU Devon, United Kingdom.
Michael N WeedonClinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, EX1 2LU Devon, United Kingdom.
Richard A OramClinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, EX1 2LU Devon, United Kingdom.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research Exeter Biomedical Research CentreNIHR or the Department of Health and Social CareRandox Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenetic risk scores (GRSs) are summaries of genetic data that can improve prediction of disease risk and progression. GRSs are increasing available but rely on high-quality input data to produce good output results; with noisy or missing inputs the GRS may be inaccurate. We aimed to develop a method to produce a robust estimate of the GRS when input data are missing, noisy or both. APPROACH: We developed a neural network approach, named masked-multi-layer perceptron (MLP), for robust GRS calculation trained on a set of GRS scores calculated on clean data. The masked-MLP includes additional input data and has noise inserted during training, both which make the model more robust.

resultsA GRS for type 1 diabetes (T1D) calculated on input data with 10% of the data corrupted had a Spearman rank correlation to the clean GRS of 0.669 (0.665-0.674) while the equivalent for the masked-MLP was 0.951 (0.950-0.952). For the same data, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for separation of T1D from population samples fell from 0.919 (0.904-0.932) to 0.808 (0.787-0.827) for the GRS while the masked-MLP fell to 0.910 (0.895-0.924).

conclusionsThe masked-MLP was more robust to noise when calculating a GRS than using standard approaches. Our approach has the potential to enable GRS calculations which are more robust to noise.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerGenetic Risk ScoreHumansMultilayer PerceptronsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidedeep learningmachine learningmulti-layer perceptronneural networknoisy inputspolygenic risk scores

Identifiers

PMID42822863
PMCPMC13630461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.