ArticlePloS one2026
Statistical patterns in the Ethereum blockchain: Analysis of EOAs and smart contracts in ERC20 token network.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scaling laws offer a powerful lens to understand complex transactional behaviors in decentralized systems. This study reveals distinctive statistical signatures in the transactional dynamics of ERC20 tokens on the Ethereum blockchain by examining over 81 million token transfers across two independent time windows: July 2017 to March 2018 and December 2019 to February 2020. Transactions are categorized into four types: EOA-EOA, EOA-SC, SC-EOA, and SC-SC based on whether the interacting addresses are Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) or Smart Contracts (SCs), and analyzed across four equal periods (each of 3 months). To characterize and identify specific statistical patterns, we investigate the presence of two canonical scaling laws: power-law distributions and temporal Taylor's law(TL). EOA-driven transactions exhibit consistent statistical behavior, including a near-linear relationship between trade volume and unique partners with stable power-law exponents (γ≈2.3), and adherence to TL with scaling coefficients (β≈2.3). In contrast, interactions involving SCs, especially SC-SC, exhibit sublinear scaling, unstable power-law exponents, and significantly fluctuating Taylor coefficients (variation in β to be Δβ=0.51). Moreover, SC-driven activity displays heavier-tailed distributions (γ<2), indicating bursty and protocol-level activity. The gas fee analysis further supports the difference between EOA and SC, with EOA-SC transactions incurring much higher gas fees, consistent with the greater computational complexity of smart contract execution and reinforcing the structural differences between EOA-driven activity and SC involvement. These findings reveal the characteristic differences between EOA-driven and SC-driven transaction behaviors in blockchain ecosystems. By uncovering scaling behaviors through the integration of complex systems theory and blockchain data analytics, this work provides a principled framework for understanding the underlying mechanisms of decentralized financial systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.