Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42821593›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Standardization of body weight distribution using a Force-Sensitive Resistor (FSR) matrix and foot analytics.

Tassadaq Hussain, Soltan Alharbi, Ali Tahir, Mutaz Elradi S Saeed, Usman Masud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tassadaq HussainCentre for AI and Big Data, Namal University, Mianwali, Pakistan.
Soltan AlharbiCollege of Engineering Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5694-1569
Ali TahirDepartment of Computer Science, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Mutaz Elradi S SaeedDepartment of Computer Science, Nile Valley University, Atbara, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6592-455X
Usman MasudPakistan Supercomputing Center, and PakASIC, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balanced body weight distribution across both feet is essential for maintaining musculoskeletal health and minimizing postural and ambulatory issues. Conventionally foot weight distribution is measured using specialized clinical equipment which are expensive and limits routine screening. Therefore, in this work, we present a standardized foot weight distribution model having a custom 32×32 force-sensing resistor (FSR) matrix based embedded system. A total of 4,000 volunteers participated in the Physical Fitness Assessment (PFA). Of these, 2,200 who passed the musculoskeletal fitness criteria were selected for foot pressure data collection. From these data, we derived a standard weight distribution pattern across foot regions: heel (45-55%), midfoot (10-15%), metatarsals (17-27%), and toes (8-13%). These standardized weight distribution patterns are used to identify deviations associated with musculoskeletal conditions that support early personalized rehabilitation and training strategies. The proposed model is implemented on a real-time embedded system and cloud platform. The embedded system uses a K230 RISC-V processor and performs real-time data acquisition, on-board data processing, and visualization of foot weight distribution. The application running on cloud platform performs statistical analysis and applies a classical support vector machine (SVM) for classifying abnormal pressure patterns. A Convolution Neural Network (CNN) based model is developed that learns fit and un-fit foot patterns from the 32×32 pressure maps. The model results show improved detection of dysfunctional weight distribution. The CNN approach shows that AI model can perform advanced predictive analytics in gait and posture assessment. The analysis is limited to static standing posture and does not include dynamic gait assessment. The normative ranges are derived primarily from subjects up to approximately 80-90 kg, as no musculoskeletally fit participants were identified in the heavier weight groups (90-120 kg); therefore, generalization to heavier individuals requires caution and further data collection.

Indexed as

Body WeightFootBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGaitHumansMalePressureSupport Vector MachineWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID42821593
PMCPMC13630229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.