Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42821584›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Learning from pandemics: Feature selection and clustering for robust digital disease nowcasting.

Sara Mesquita, João Loureiro, Cláudio Haupt Vieira, Lília Perfeito, Joana Gonçalves-Sá

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara MesquitaLIP - Laboratory for Instrumentation and Experimental Particle Physics, Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto 2, Lisboa, Portugal.
João LoureiroLIP - Laboratory for Instrumentation and Experimental Particle Physics, Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto 2, Lisboa, Portugal.
Cláudio Haupt VieiraNOVA School of Business and Economics, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Rua da Holanda, Carcavelos, Portugal.
Lília PerfeitoLIP - Laboratory for Instrumentation and Experimental Particle Physics, Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto 2, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4844-8763
Joana Gonçalves-SáLIP - Laboratory for Instrumentation and Experimental Particle Physics, Avenida Prof. Gama Pinto 2, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6654-2126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease now-casting increasingly relies on non-traditional data, such as online activity, which offer fast, inexpensive insights but are often noisy, unstructured, and influenced by behavioral confounders. Models using search engine data have frequently suffered from overfitting and unstable performance. However, pandemics may help distinguish true disease signals from behavioral noise, as both tend to surge during outbreaks. We propose a hybrid approach to improve prediction that combines model evaluation with behavioral insight. We apply simple supervised and unsupervised methods to different flu and COVID-19 datasets, using the 2009 H1N1 and 2020 COVID-19 pandemics as training periods. In both cases, selecting a curated subset of search terms improved model performance, reduced overfitting, and increased stability, consistently outperforming models that used search terms indiscriminately. These results suggest that feature curation informed by behavioral insights can enhance now-casting beyond purely statistical approaches. Our method offers a scalable and adaptable framework for integrating digital epidemiology into public health surveillance.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanPandemicsCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsDigital HealthHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID42821584
PMCPMC13630223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.