ArticlePloS one2026
Automated model discovery based on COVID-19 epidemiological data from Thuringia, Germany.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic presented severe challenges in understanding and predicting the spread of infectious diseases, necessitating innovative approaches beyond traditional epidemiological models. This study introduces an advanced method for automated model discovery using the Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) algorithm, leveraging a dataset from the COVID-19 outbreak in Thuringia, Germany, encompassing more than 400,000 patient records and vaccination data. We develop a flexible, data-driven model capturing pandemic dynamics, incorporating external factors and interventions into the mathematical framework. The fixed coefficient values globally determined by SINDy were not accurate for local modelling of the data, a limitation of prior SINDy-based epidemiological applications that our framework directly addresses. We therefore refined our technique based on the differential equations as found by SINDy, by investigating three modifications that account for recent local data, each offering different strengths for short-term prediction, scenario analysis, and capturing nonlinear effects, achieving an R² of 0.87 at a one-week horizon. In a first approach, we re-optimized the coefficient values using seven days of past data, without changing the globally determined differential equation. In a second approach, we allowed a temporal dependence of the coefficient values, fitted using all previous data, in combination with regularization. As a last method, we kept the coefficients fixed to the original values but augmented the differential equation with a small neural network, locally optimized to the data of the past week. Our results link vaccination and public health measures to the pandemic's trajectory. The proposed model allows simulation of intervention scenarios, such as vaccination strategies and public health interventions. While the current study is based on retrospective data from a single region, the framework could serve as a basis for exploring responses to future outbreaks, subject to further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.