ArticlePLOS global public health2026
SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody profiles reveal variant specific antibody dynamics and regional differences in infection histories in Malawi.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Serological data provide important insights into SARS-CoV-2 transmission and immunity, particularly in regions with limited routine surveillance such as sub-Saharan Africa. However, antibody waning and boosting following reinfection or vaccination remain poorly characterised, complicating interpretation of serological measurements. Improved understanding of these dynamics is critical for accurate epidemiological inference. Modelling longitudinal serological data provides a means to quantify antibody kinetics and reconstruct infection histories. We analysed 15,679 neutralising antibody (nAb) titres from 1,675 unvaccinated, HIV-uninfected participants in urban (Lilongwe) and rural (Karonga) Malawi (February 2021-April 2022). NAb titres against ancestral B.1, Beta, Delta, and Omicron (BA.1/BA.2) viruses were measured using an HIV-based SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped virus neutralisation assay. A multi-level Bayesian model was used to reconstruct infection histories and antibody kinetics. The model identified 429 infections (95% credible interval 417-441), including 39 (9.1%) that had not been identified by traditional seroconversion-based thresholds. Antibody levels waned rapidly, with 48% (0.403-0.560) of the acute boost remaining after three months and only 5% (0.027-0.098) after one year. Pre-Omicron infections generated stronger antibody boosts than Omicron infections. Responses varied, with individuals clustering into low and high responders. Cross-reactive responses extended across substantial antigenic distances - Omicron infections induced broader immunity. Seroincidence was higher in Lilongwe than in Karonga (0.41 vs. 0.27 infections per person per three months), driven by the early 2022 Omicron wave. Reinfections were common, particularly among adults and urban residents. SARS-CoV-2 nAb responses following infection were heterogeneous and declined rapidly. This rapid waning underscores the importance of vaccination for sustained protection, while cross-reactivity suggests only partial immunity from prior variants. Identifying reinfections is essential for understanding transmission and finding populations at higher repeat infection risk, particularly where routine surveillance is limited.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.