ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Impacts of digital third-wave interventions for adults on wellbeing and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To synthesise the efficacy of digital third-wave process-based interventions (e.g., ACT, Mindfulness, Compassion) for improving wellbeing and ameliorating mental health symptoms in adults. A prospectively registered systematic review (OSF: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5RMU2) and random-effects meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted across six databases through January 2026. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. Interventions (k = 147; N = 26,391) yielded small-to-moderate immediate post-intervention improvements in wellbeing (k = 46, g = 0.36), depression (k = 110, g = 0.44), anxiety (k = 93, g = 0.40), stress (k = 66, g = 0.46), quality of life (k = 32, g = 0.30), and psychological flexibility (k = 51, g = 0.41). Heterogeneity was substantial across most outcomes (I2 > 75%). Benefits were observed across healthy (61 trials; n = 15,770), mental health (41 trials; n = 6,130), and medical samples (46 trials; n = 4,491), with population type not significantly moderating immediate post-intervention effects. Comparator type significantly moderated several analyses, with smaller effects against active than inactive controls. Guidance did not significantly moderate immediate post-intervention effects, although it predicted larger short-term depression effects (QM = 4.17, p = .048). At short-term follow-up, effects remained statistically supported across all outcomes, while only depression, anxiety, and stress remained statistically supported at medium-term follow-up. GRADE certainty was moderate for most immediate post-intervention outcomes and low for quality of life. Digital third-wave interventions produced small-to-moderate average benefits across symptom-focused, wellbeing-focused, and process outcomes. Effects were smaller against active comparators, indicating that pooled benefits should be interpreted in relation to comparator intensity. Future research should prioritise rigorous active controls, longer follow-up, and direct tests of whether changes in psychological flexibility mediate improvements in symptoms and wellbeing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.