ArticlePloS one2026
Telemedicine education for medical students and residents worldwide: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine has become an increasingly important component of contemporary health care delivery, yet its integration into undergraduate and graduate medical education remains variable and insufficiently standardized. Although individual studies have described telemedicine training initiatives, the literature remains fragmented across disciplines, learner groups, and geographic settings, limiting understanding of how telemedicine is taught, learned, assessed, and implemented for medical trainees worldwide. This scoping review aims to map the characteristics of telemedicine education for medical students enrolled in undergraduate or graduate entry physician training programs and for resident physicians, examine variation across learner groups, specialties, and geographic contexts, and identify reported implementation factors, barriers, facilitators, and evidence gaps. The review will follow Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A comprehensive search will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Education Resources Information Center, Web of Science, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, with additional studies identified through reference list screening of included articles. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full-texts against predefined eligibility criteria and will extract data using a structured, piloted form. Findings will be synthesized descriptively in tabular and narrative formats to characterize curricular content, teaching methods, assessment strategies, and contextual influences on implementation. By providing a comprehensive map of the existing literature, this review will inform future curriculum development, educational research, and policy related to telemedicine training in medical education. Review registration: Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://osf.io/jxudv).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.