Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42821533›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

The use of artificial intelligence in assessing fever in the returning traveller: A scoping review.

Bhavya Gandhi, Leo Morjaria, Imeth Illamperuma, Meha Bhatt, Andrew Kapoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bhavya GandhiMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5925-6602
Leo MorjariaMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Imeth IllamperumaMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3778-7635
Meha BhattMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew KapoorMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6078-5984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fever in the returning traveller is a challenging presentation that requires a wide array of clinical expertise and draws on complex medical decision-making. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have shown it can be a helpful clinical support tool in this context. This scoping review, conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines and registered on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BSPKX), aimed to identify the current state of artificial intelligence use in assessing fever in the returning traveller. Here we describe the three eligible studies evaluating three distinct AI approaches identified in the literature. These heterogenous studies reported promising performance on study-specific endpoints in controlled settings. Given the lack of external validation, narrow populations studied, and absence of real-world implementation or user acceptance testing, further research is needed to explore this technology in a real-world clinical setting. The limited available evidence suggests that AI may have future potential to support assessment of fever in the returning traveller; however, clinical utility, safety, and real-world effectiveness remain unestablished. Large language models represent an emerging area of interest but were not evaluated in the studies included in this review.

Identifiers

PMID42821533
PMCPMC13630189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.