SynthesisPloS one2026
Efficacy of nebulized salbutamol in transient tachypnea of the newborn: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN) commonly affects near- and full-term infants and often requires respiratory support. The use of nebulized salbutamol to improve respiratory outcomes has been of interest, though its clinical efficacy remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether nebulized salbutamol improves clinical outcomes in affected infants. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of nebulized salbutamol in infants with TTN. We used a random-effects model to calculate mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-five studies were included in the systematic review, comprising seventeen RCTs for meta-analysis involving 1,317 infants. The analysis showed that salbutamol significantly decreased the duration of respiratory support (MD: -14.85 hours; 95% CI [-25.05, -4.65]; p = 0.004), duration of continuous positive airway pressure (MD: -18.19 hours; 95% CI [-30.03, -6.35]; p = 0.003), duration of oxygen requirement (MD: -24.57 hours; 95% CI [-35.03, -14.10]; p < 0.001), and length of hospitalization (MD: -1.17 days; 95% CI [-1.69, -0.65]; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant decrease in duration of tachypnea (MD: -9.93 hours; 95% CI [-25.42, 5.56]; p = 0.21) or duration of neonatal intensive care unit stay (MD: -0.84 days; 95% CI [-2.62, 0.94]; p = 0.36). Subgroup analysis for respiratory support duration showed no significant effect in infants with clinical score of TTN < 5 (MD: -10.88 hours; 95% CI [-24.48, 2.73]; p = 0.12), while the certainty of evidence for all outcomes was low to very low. Nebulized salbutamol may improve clinical outcomes relevant to the evolution of the disease in TTN infants, with potential benefits in certain subgroups such as those with greater disease severity, though the available evidence is of low to very low certainty. Therefore, our confidence in its efficacy in treating TTN remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.