ArticlePLoS biology2026
Breadth of ACE2 receptor usage predicts host range and antigenic relatedness across bat sarbecoviruses.
Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sarbecoviruses interact with their receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), via the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of Spike, the immunodominant target for neutralising antibodies. Understanding the interplay and correlation between ACE2-determined host range and antigenicity is vitally important for understanding the zoonotic potential of related bat sarbecoviruses. Using binding assays, pseudotype-entry assays and a diverse panel of mammalian ACE2 proteins, we examined the host range and related antigenicity of multiple bat coronaviruses. Broad bat ACE2 usage (a generalist phenotype) was most common in clade 1 sarbecoviruses, including SARS-CoV-2 and the BANAL isolates from Laos. In contrast, clade 3 (e.g., RhGB07) and 5 (e.g., Rc-o319) sarbecoviruses exhibited more restricted ACE2 usage (a specialist phenotype). A novel structure for RhGB07 Spike further helped to identify RBD residues associated with this receptor specialism. Interestingly, the generalist phenotypes were largely maintained with more diverse mammalian receptor libraries, including human, non-human primate, livestock, rodent ACE2 and potential intermediate reservoir hosts (e.g., civet, racoon dog, pangolin), while specialists, like RhGB07, exhibited wider phenotypic diversity. The impact of SARS-CoV-2's continued evolution in humans was also examined, identifying an expanding and/or shifting pattern of generalism for variants, especially Omicron and its sub-lineages. Furthermore, we compared and correlated these entry phenotypes with antigenicity using sera from SARS-CoV-2 convalescent individuals. Clade 1 viruses, phylogenetically related to SARS-CoV-2, were antigenically the most similar, with robust evidence for cross-neutralisation; however, there was still evidence for limited cross-neutralisation across the entire sub-genus. Finally, using monoclonal antibodies, derived from COVID-19 vaccinees with breakthrough infections, we pin-pointed the antibody epitope classes responsible for wider neutralisation. Our research indicates that generalist ACE2-using sarbecoviruses are phylogenetically and antigenically related to SARS-CoV-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.