Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42821259›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Medical Debt and Advanced Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Jiazhang Xing, Xuesong Han, Xin Hu, Lingbin Meng, Lang Qu, Ryan D Nipp, K Robin Yabroff, Changchuan Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiazhang XingDepartment of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
Xuesong HanDepartment of Surveillance, Prevention and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Xin HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lingbin MengDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Lang QuDepartment of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ryan D NippDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health and Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City.
K Robin YabroffDepartment of Surveillance, Prevention and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Changchuan JiangDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Medical debt affects millions of US residents and has been associated with higher cancer mortality. Whether medical debt burden is associated with incidence of advanced stage cancer, a key determinant of survival, remains unclear. Objective: To examine the association between medical debt and cancer incidence in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used ecological county-level data linking 2016 medical debt with age-adjusted incidence rates of 9 cancers from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. The study included 2958 US counties with available data on medical debt in collections and cancer incidence rates. Population-based data were obtained and analyzed from January 11, 2025, to February 15, 2026. Exposure: Percentage of residents with any medical debt in collections in 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Age-adjusted all-stage and late-stage (regional or distant) cancer incidence rates per 100 000 person-years from 2017 to 2021. Multivariable models adjusted for urban-rural status, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), primary care physician density, and states were used to estimate differences in age-adjusted incidence rates of cancer associated with county-level medical debt burden. Results: Among the 2958 US counties included in the analysis, 1154 (39.0%) were urban and 1804 (61.0%) were rural. The mean (SD) prevalence of medical debt in collections was 21.1% (9.6%), with a mean (SD) primary care physician density of 0.54 (0.35) physicians per 1000 population. The prevalence of medical debt ranged from 1.2% to 51.8%. The mean (SD) medical debt prevalence was higher in rural than urban counties (21.5% [10.0%] vs 20.5% [8.9%]; P = .007) and in counties in the highest vs lowest SVI quartile (27.4% [9.0%] vs 13.9% [6.9%]; P < .001). After adjustment, each 10percentage point increase in county-level medical debt was associated with a higher incidence of late-stage lung cancer (5.15 [95% CI, 4.62-5.68] additional cases per 100 000 person-years), colorectal cancer (0.69 [95% CI, 0.44-0.94] additional cases per 100 000 person-years), cervical cancer (0.39 [95% CI, 0.23-0.55] additional cases per 100 000 person-years), melanoma (0.59 [95% CI, 0.48-0.70] additional cases per 100 000 person-years), kidney and renal pelvis cancer (0.38 [95% CI, 0.27-0.49] additional cases per 100 000 person-years), bladder cancer (0.24 [95% CI, 0.16-0.32] additional cases per 100 000 person-years), and head and neck cancer (0.92 [95% CI, 0.77-1.07] additional cases per 100 000 person-years). Similar patterns were observed for overall cancer incidence. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US counties, higher medical debt burden was associated with higher incidence rates of late-stage and overall cancer across multiple cancer types. These findings suggest that medical debt may reflect structural and financial barriers associated with cancer diagnosis and outcomes at the population level.

Indexed as

Medical DebtNeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleNeoplasm StagingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42821259
PMCPMC13631788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.