Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42821238›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

Understanding and advancing alignment of the national standards for cancer survivorship care for adolescents and young adults: challenges and opportunities.

AYA National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care Consortium, Andrea C Betts, K Scott Baker, Anne H Blaes, Katie A Devine, Erin E Hahn, Kimberly A Miller, Helen M Parsons, Jean C Yi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

AYA National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care Consortium
Andrea C BettsDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas, TX, 75207, USA. andrea.c.betts@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0884-6513
K Scott BakerFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Anne H BlaesDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Katie A DevineDivision of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute , New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Erin E HahnDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Kimberly A MillerDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90039, USA.
Helen M ParsonsDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Jean C YiFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors experience substantial late and long-term effects and require high-quality survivorship care. This work examines methodological challenges and related opportunities in assessing survivorship care availability, utilization, and key barriers and facilitators for AYAs, using the new National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care as a guiding framework.

methodsStudies were conducted across nine geographically diverse health care systems in seven states (CA, FL, MN, NJ, NY, TX, WA), including seven NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers, a large integrated health care system, and a county safety-net hospital. Designs included retrospective cohort and mixed methods approaches. Data collection methods comprised EHR abstraction; surveys of AYAs, clinicians, and administrators; and in-depth interviews and/or focus groups with AYAs, clinicians, and administrators. Across studies, AYAs were diagnosed between 2014 and 2024, were 15-44 years old at diagnosis, predominantly female, and racially and ethnically diverse, and had common AYA cancers.

resultsStudies encountered challenges in defining survivorship care, accounting for AYA-specific factors, and addressing the complexity of survivorship care and the NCI Standards. First, we observed difficulties in defining and operationalizing survivorship care components, particularly in EHR data and across audiences who differed in how they understood survivorship care. Second, AYA-related factors such as geographic mobility, insurance changes, and fragmented care during young adulthood complicated assessment, especially for longitudinal analyses. Finally, the complexity of survivorship care and of the standards themselves posed substantial measurement challenges. In this context, collaboration and integration of data within and across AYA survivorship studies represent key research opportunities. Addressing known AYA barriers and priorities will be critical for guiding how the survivorship standards are evaluated and incorporated into clinical practice for AYAs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Advancing the National Standards for Cancer Survivorship Care for AYAs requires nuanced approaches that integrate multiple perspectives, data sources, and care contexts.

Indexed as

Adolescent and young adult cancerAYACancer survivorshipPractice guidelinesSurvivorship care delivery

Identifiers

PMID42821238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.