Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42821214›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2026

Weight Loss Measurements Under the Microscope: How Type and Baseline Definition Shape Clinical Response After Metabolic-Bariatric Surgery - A 2-Year Follow-up Analysis of 17,568 Patients.

Mira Fink, Geoffroy Andrieux, Stephan Herrmann, Ning Wei, Luisa Schäfer, Claudia Lässle, Andreas Tsouris, Jodok Fink, Goran Marjanovic, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mira FinkDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. mira.fink@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Geoffroy AndrieuxInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Stephan HerrmannDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8091-6630
Ning WeiDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Luisa SchäferDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Claudia LässleDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas TsourisInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jodok FinkDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Goran MarjanovicDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Stefan Fichtner-FeiglDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Gabriel SeifertDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. gabriel.seifert@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the era of modern metabolic-bariatric surgery, increasing attention is being paid to the assessment of clinical response after surgery. With the growing availability of multimodal obesity treatment, including preoperative pharmacological and lifestyle interventions, identification and optimization of factors associated with a suboptimal clinical response after metabolic-bariatric surgery (MBS) have become increasingly important. When considering weight loss specifically, two methodological factors substantially influence the interpretation of postoperative response: the metric used to quantify weight loss (percent total weight loss [%TWL] versus percent excess weight loss [%EWL]) and the baseline from which the weight-loss trajectory is calculated.

objectiveTo illustrate how different weight-loss metrics and baseline definitions influence the interpretation of postoperative response and the apparent association between preoperative characteristics and suboptimal clinical response after MBS.

methodsWe analyzed 17,568 patients from the StuDoQ|MBE registry who underwent primary MBS and had complete 2-year postoperative follow-up data. Postoperative suboptimal clinical response was assessed using the 2024 IFSO reporting threshold of <20% TWL. Because the registry did not contain sufficiently standardized longitudinal information on improvement of obesity-related complications, the clinical component of the IFSO definition could not be incorporated. The historical threshold of <50% EWL was additionally analyzed as a surrogate criterion to facilitate comparison with previous literature. Multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the associations of preoperative BMI and preoperative weight loss with these weight-loss-based outcomes. Analyses distinguished between cumulative weight loss, calculated from the earliest documented weight before initiation of preoperative weight reduction, and postsurgical weight loss, calculated from weight at the time of surgery to follow-up. Partial-effects plots and heatmaps were used to visualize the modeled associations.

resultsThe proportion of patients classified according to weight-loss-based criteria for suboptimal clinical response varied substantially according to the metric used, with more patients meeting the historical <50% EWL criterion than the IFSO-consistent <20% TWL threshold. Higher preoperative BMI was associated with a greater probability of meeting the historical <50% EWL criterion, whereas the association was reversed when suboptimal response was defined using <20% TWL. The definition of the baseline weight also substantially influenced the interpretation of preoperative weight loss. Greater preoperative weight loss was associated with a lower probability of weight-loss-based suboptimal clinical response when assessed cumulatively from the beginning of the preoperative treatment trajectory, whereas greater preoperative weight loss was associated with a higher probability of meeting the postsurgical suboptimal weight-loss criteria when weight at the day of surgery was used as the baseline.

conclusionThe choice of weight-loss metric and baseline definition substantially influences the classification of postoperative weight-loss response and the apparent association between preoperative characteristics and surgical outcomes. %EWL and %TWL are not interchangeable measures and can produce opposing interpretations of the association between baseline BMI and postoperative response. Consistent with the 2024 IFSO consensus, weight-loss assessment after MBS should use a baseline established before initiation of preoperative weight reduction where appropriate, particularly when evaluating the overall treatment trajectory. %TWL provides a more readily comparable metric for standardized reporting, whereas %EWL may remain useful for comparison with historical literature. Because clinical response after MBS is multidimensional, weight-loss thresholds should not be interpreted as synonymous with clinical treatment failure.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryExcess weight lossGLP-1 receptor agonistsOutcome reportingPrehabilitationTotal weight loss

Identifiers

PMID42821214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.