ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
A call to action for the harmonization of education and training for clinical embryologists: a framing paper.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment cycles, facilities, and fertility services has created unprecedented demand for a skilled workforce. Concurrently, clinical embryology has expanded in complexity and scope. Nevertheless, education and training for clinical embryologists remain inconsistent worldwide, with only a limited number of well-established frameworks. This framing paper examines gaps in education, training, competency assessment, and professional recognition and presents a pragmatic roadmap to support a proficient and sustainable workforce. We review representative training models for embryologists and identify persistent gaps within the laboratory workforce. Together, these insights aim to guide the development of a consistent, competency-based global clinical embryology workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42821211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.