ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026
From Delay Discounting to Gambling Harm: Gambling-related Cognitive Distortions as Mediating Pathways.
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delay discounting is a well-established behavioral vulnerability marker across addictive disorders, including gambling disorder. However, the cognitive processes through which steep delay discounting relates to gambling problems remain unclear. This study investigates gambling-related cognitive distortions as potential correlates linking impulsive decision-making to gambling harm, addressing the gap between distal neurocognitive risk markers and proximal addiction severity. In a sample of active gamblers (N = 1484), we administered a delay discounting task alongside self-report measures of gambling-related cognitive distortions, problem gambling severity, and gambling frequency. Higher delay discounting rates significantly predicted problem gambling severity, even after controlling for education and socioeconomic status, highlighting its unique association with gambling harm. Mediation analyses revealed that the association between delay discounting and gambling harm was predominantly indirect, with specific loss-of-control beliefs and interpretative bias emerging as the strongest proximal cognitive correlates, emphasizing the specificity of cognitive distortions that account for this relationship. The findings are consistent with Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution assumptions concerning the role of cognitive processes in the association between impulsive reward valuation and gambling harm. The findings suggest that delay discounting may be associated with problem gambling severity through gambling-related cognitive distortions, indicating that this relationship may partly involve how gambling experiences are interpreted and appraised. Targeting gambling-specific cognitive distortions may therefore be essential for successful prevention and treatment efforts. Due to the cross-sectional nature of our data, longitudinal or experimental studies are needed to examine causal relationships and clarify the temporal pathways linking delay discounting, cognitive distortions, and gambling disorder severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42821202What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.