ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2026
Beyond the Index Case: A Practical Framework for Cascade Family Screening in Hereditary Angioedema.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a genetic disorder characterised by recurrent cutaneous or submucosal oedema. Most cases are caused by pathogenic SERPING1 variants (types I and II), while a smaller subset presents with normal C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) levels and function (HAE-nC1INH). Despite its potentially life-threatening attacks, HAE remains under-diagnosed owing to inconsistent screening practices, low clinical awareness, poor patient acceptance, and resource limitations, resulting in diagnostic delays and preventable morbidity. Although international guidelines recommend family screening to identify at-risk relatives, no standardised protocol exists for its systematic implementation. Cascade family screening offers a structured approach to trace and test all known at-risk relatives across generations. Complementing this strategy, dried blood spot (DBS) assays provide a less invasive, cost-effective alternative to conventional serological testing, with particular utility in resource-limited settings. In this review, we critically appraise current screening methodologies, synthesise emerging evidence on cascade family screening and DBS-based diagnostics, and propose an actionable clinical flowchart to standardise identification, testing, and patient education from index case detection through multi-generational family screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.