ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Artificial intelligence-based anatomical segmentation in transabdominal preperitoneal repair of groin hernia.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAccurate identification of critical anatomical structures, including hernia orifices and Cooper's ligament, is crucial to ensure appropriate mesh placement during transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP). However, the posterior view of the inguinal wall is often less familiar to general surgeons, possibly contributing to the intraoperative misidentification of key anatomical landmarks. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model for supporting the recognition of these critical anatomical structures.
methodsWe calculated 2,725 images which were extracted from 89 surgical videos of TAPP procedures by three surgeons at a single center. The extracted frames were annotated for the hernia orifices, Cooper's ligament, inferior epigastric vessels, testicular vessels, and vas deferens. Annotation was initially performed by an experienced medical student and subsequently confirmed by two board-certified surgeons. Ten-fold cross-validation was performed to train and assess the AI-based model. Model performance was evaluated using the Intersection over Union (IoU), which quantifies the overlap between AI-generated and ground-truth segmentations on a scale from 0 (no overlap) to 1 (perfect overlap).
resultsThe mean IoUs for the direct hernia orifices, indirect hernia orifices, Cooper's ligament, inferior epigastric vessels, testicular vessels, and vas deferens were 0.391, 0.325, 0.562, 0.451, 0.555 and 0.554, respectively. The performance was comparable to or exceeding that reported for selected anatomical structures in previous studies.
conclusionThe AI-based model recognized critical anatomical structures during TAPP. Its integration into clinical practice may improve intraoperative recognition of critical anatomical structures and facilitate appropriate mesh placement during TAPP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42821130What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.