ReviewJournal of neurology2026
Spinal cord imaging in multiple sclerosis: from diagnosis to disease progression.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord (SC) involvement in multiple sclerosis (MS) is common and a major determinant of long-term disability in both relapsing and progressive disease phenotypes. Despite this, SC pathology remains under-assessed in both clinical practice and therapeutic trials, largely due to technical challenges inherent to spinal SC magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conferred by the cord's small anatomical size and sensitivity to physiological motion and susceptibility artefact. This review synthesises current understanding of SC involvement in MS, integrating advances in pathophysiology, imaging, and clinical application. We describe the characteristic MRI features of MS SC lesions and their key inflammatory and non-inflammatory differentials, and examine the role of SC imaging in diagnosis, particularly in the context of the 2024 revisions to the McDonald criteria. We highlight the prognostic importance of SC lesions and atrophy, including their association with progression independent of relapse activity, and review the limited and heterogeneous evidence regarding the effects of disease-modifying therapies on SC pathology. We further evaluate current MRI acquisition strategies and consensus guidelines, and discuss emerging quantitative and advanced imaging techniques that detect microstructural and biochemical abnormalities beyond conventional imaging. Together, these developments support a more systematic integration of SC imaging into MS clinical care and trial design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42821125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.