ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Decision-making in paediatric palliative sedation: A vignette survey across five European countries.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores how physicians approach the initiation and management of paediatric palliative sedation therapy (PST) in two end-of-life scenarios. It aims to inform future practice, particularly given the current absence of comprehensive international and national guidelines in most countries. A quantitative dual-vignette study was conducted across five European countries, using an oncological and metabolic end-of-life scenario. The questionnaire examined participant characteristics, decisions and procedures related to initiating paediatric PST, consultation with parents and healthcare providers, and clinical responses following sedation initiation. Overall, 55.6% of respondents indicated they would initiate sedation in vignettes intentionally envisioned as candidates for palliative sedation. Morphine (66.0%) and midazolam (55.2%) were the most commonly selected drugs for initiating paediatric PST. Approximately one-third (31.2%) would start or continue intravenous fluids, while a majority would discontinue non-comfort medications (84.8%), monitoring (56.8%) and nutrition (56.0%). In the metabolic vignette, significant cross-country differences were observed in decisions regarding fluids, feeding and medication use (p < 0.05). Most respondents would involve parents in decision-making (83.2%) and would discuss the case in a multidisciplinary meeting (76.0%). Across clinical scenarios, physicians would adjust medication primarily in response to the child's assessed level of distress, escalating therapeutic measures as symptom severity increased.
conclusionSubstantial variability exists in physicians' approaches to paediatric PST across clinical scenarios and countries. These findings demonstrate that, while certain clinical principles such as first-line medications are commonly upheld, considerable heterogeneity in practice of paediatric PST remains, underscoring the need for paediatric-specific guidance and training to ensure consistent and evidence-based decisions. WHAT IS KNOWN: • PST aims to relieve intolerable, refractory end-of-life symptoms, and is used in 7-12% of paediatric deaths. • Opioids and benzodiazepines are most commonly used. However, limited paediatric guidelines and infrequent use of PST, results in considerable variability in medication choices, team involvement and overall practice. WHAT IS NEW: • This first international vignette study on paediatric PST shows major variation across countries and clinical scenarios, in medication adjustments, monitoring and artificial hydration. • The Netherlands, the only participating country with national guidelines, showed near-unanimity in responses, suggesting a potential role for national guidelines in promoting consistency in clinical practice?
Indexed as
Identifiers
42821121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.