ArticleFood science of animal resources2026
Preliminary optimization and quality assessment of high-pressure processing for venison preservation.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment conditions of a High-Pressure Processing (HPP) method were optimized for wild deer meat, considering both microbial reduction load and the impact on physicochemical and sensory characteristics. Different pressure levels (350, 450 and 550 MPa) and treatment times (3 and 6 min) were evaluated. Microbial reduction increased with higher pressure levels, however, undesirable effects on colour and sensory characteristics were also observed. The most suitable treatment was 350 MPa for 6 min, achieving a 99.9% reduction in mesophilic aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, E. coli, and Staphylococcus spp., as well as the complete elimination of Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. in the analysed wild deer loins. This treatment caused slight increases in L*, b* and water-holding capability, while pH and moisture content remained unaffected. Significant sensory differences were observed among raw samples, mainly related to texture and colour; however, these differences were not evident after cooking. Cryo-SEM analysis revealed structural modifications in the muscle microstructure induced by HPP, which are likely associated with the observed changes in texture. The preliminary results are promising and provide a solid basis for future studies involving a larger number of samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.