ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2026
Rethinking Monospecific Antibody Therapy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Dual- and Multispecific Antibodies.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disorder in which type 2 inflammation predominates but varies in its local organization, clinical context, and downstream tissue effects. Biologics targeting interleukin-4 receptor alpha, immunoglobulin E, the interleukin-5/interleukin-5 receptor axis, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin have expanded treatment options for severe disease and can improve polyp burden, nasal obstruction, olfactory function, quality of life, and corticosteroid- or surgery-related outcomes. However, responses remain variable across patients and clinical domains, and incomplete control may reflect target mismatch, persistent parallel inflammatory pathways, comorbid airway disease, or established tissue remodeling rather than insufficient pathway coverage alone. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms and clinical evidence for current monospecific antibodies and examine biological contexts that may contribute to variable treatment responses, including local IgE activity, microbial and antigenic amplification, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD), comorbid asthma, and persistent epithelial remodeling. We then discuss biomarkers, multidimensional response assessment, and clinical positioning of biologic therapy before evaluating the rationale, boundaries, molecular design, and current pipeline of dual- and multispecific antibodies. Attention is given to whether broader pathway targeting can provide incremental benefit over optimized monospecific therapy, while maintaining acceptable long-term safety, treatment practicality, and economic value. The future role of multispecific biologics in CRSwNP will depend on rational target pairing, comparative clinical evidence, and improved identification of patients most likely to benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42821054What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.