ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2026
Under the Drapes: Unmasking the Mechanisms and Clinical Diagnosis of Perioperative Hypersensitivity.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewPerioperative hypersensitivity reactions are uncommon but potentially life-threatening complications of anaesthesia and remain a major concern in clinical practice. This review provides an updated overview of the mechanisms and aetiologies underlying perioperative hypersensitivity and examines contemporary diagnostic strategies for identifying the responsible agent. Emphasis is placed on the integration of clinical assessment with laboratory and functional testing to establish an accurate diagnosis and guide the selection of safe alternatives for subsequent anaesthetic procedures. Current evidence is complemented by the authors' extensive clinical experience in the field. NEW
findingsRecent advances have highlighted the complexity of perioperative hypersensitivity, encompassing both antigen-dependent and non-antigen-dependent mechanisms. Neuromuscular blocking agents, antibiotics, latex, and chlorhexidine remain among the most frequently implicated triggers, underscoring the importance of a systematic and comprehensive evaluation. A stepwise diagnostic strategy integrating in vitro assays, skin testing, basophil and mast cell activation tests, and, in selected cases, drug provocation testing can improve identification of the culprit agent and assessment of alternative drugs. The complementary use of these approaches, interpreted within the clinical context, is particularly important when conventional testing yields inconclusive results. Accurate identification of the cause of perioperative hypersensitivity is critical to preventing recurrent, potentially fatal reactions and ensuring safe future anaesthetic care. A structured diagnostic approach that combines detailed clinical evaluation with targeted immunological and functional testing enables individualised risk assessment and informed selection of alternative agents. Incorporating current evidence with clinical expertise can therefore optimise diagnostic accuracy and strengthen strategies for the prevention of recurrent perioperative hypersensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42821016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.