ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Dual-energy CT virtual non-calcium imaging for differentiating pathologic from non-pathologic femoral fractures: a study of inexperienced non-radiologist readers.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effect of dual-energy CT (DECT) virtual non-calcium (VNCa) imaging on the ability of inexperienced non-radiologist readers to differentiate pathologic from non-pathologic femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective diagnostic accuracy study, 45 eligible emergency department patients with femoral fractures who underwent DECT between January 2022 and September 2024 were included, comprising 20 patients with pathologic fractures and 25 with non-pathologic fractures. The reference standard for fracture classification was established using surgical records or histopathologic results. Two inexperienced non-radiologist readers independently evaluated conventional CT alone and conventional CT combined with color-coded DECT VNCa images in separate reading sessions. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were compared between the two sessions. AUCs were compared using the paired DeLong test.
resultsThe addition of DECT VNCa significantly improved sensitivity for detecting pathologic fractures in both readers. For Reader 1, sensitivity increased from 65 to 95% (p = 0.031), and accuracy increased from 77.8% to 95.6%. For Reader 2, sensitivity increased from 50 to 85% (p = 0.016), and accuracy increased from 68.9% to 91.1%. Specificity remained high without significant differences between sessions. AUC increased from 0.765 (95% CI, 0.617-0.913) to 0.955 (95% CI, 0.883-1.0) for Reader 1 and from 0.670 (95% CI, 0.506-0.834) to 0.905 (95% CI, 0.802-1.0) for Reader 2 (p = 0.0135 and < 0.01, respectively).
conclusionAdding color-coded DECT VNCa to conventional CT improves the diagnostic performance of inexperienced non-radiologist readers in detecting pathologic femoral fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42820978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.