Trial reportRheumatology international2026
Does baseline physical function modify the response to a physical activity intervention in adults with arthritis? A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.
Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Responses to physical activity interventions vary among adults with arthritis, and baseline functional limitations may affect increases in walking. To determine whether baseline physical function moderated changes in accelerometer-measured steps/day after a telephone-delivered Walk With Ease (WWE-T) intervention. This secondary analysis included 267 adults from a randomized trial of WWE-T versus wait-list control. Baseline function was assessed with the 30-Second Chair Stand Test and 6-Minute Walk Test and categorized as high or low using sample means. Steps/day were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Repeated-measures mixed-effects models tested time, physical function category, intervention group, and their three-way interaction, adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. Participants had a mean age of 64.2 years (standard deviation 9.2); 92% were female, and mean body mass index was 34.2 kg/m² (standard deviation 7.7). The three-way interaction for chair stands was not significant (P = 0.27). Higher chair-stand performance was associated with more steps/day across follow-up (P = 0.0003). In the high-repetition WWE-T subgroup, steps/day increased at 6 weeks by 731 (95% confidence interval 281 to 1182) and at 6 months by 457 (72 to 843). The three-way interaction for walking endurance was not significant (P = 0.20), though higher walking endurance was associated with more steps/day (P < 0.0001). The presence of limitations with physical function did not moderate changes to steps/day following a telephone‑delivered physical activity intervention, though those without limitations had more steps/day.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42820960What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.