Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42820960›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology international2026

Does baseline physical function modify the response to a physical activity intervention in adults with arthritis? A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

Nurten Gizem Tore, Christine A Pellegrini, Kailyn Horn, Sara Wilcox, Sydney C Liles, Yesil Kim, Daniel K White

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nurten Gizem ToreDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 S College Ave, Suite 160, Newark, DE, 19713, USA. gizemtore@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3564
Christine A PellegriniDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. PELLEGCA@mailbox.sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0922-0195
Kailyn HornDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. KHORN@email.sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6474-2592
Sara WilcoxDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. WILCOXS@mailbox.sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-4610
Sydney C LilesDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 S College Ave, Suite 160, Newark, DE, 19713, USA. scliles@udel.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3984-7810
Yesil KimPrevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. YK7@mailbox.sc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2254-3224
Daniel K WhiteDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 S College Ave, Suite 160, Newark, DE, 19713, USA. dkw@udel.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3792-4621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responses to physical activity interventions vary among adults with arthritis, and baseline functional limitations may affect increases in walking. To determine whether baseline physical function moderated changes in accelerometer-measured steps/day after a telephone-delivered Walk With Ease (WWE-T) intervention. This secondary analysis included 267 adults from a randomized trial of WWE-T versus wait-list control. Baseline function was assessed with the 30-Second Chair Stand Test and 6-Minute Walk Test and categorized as high or low using sample means. Steps/day were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. Repeated-measures mixed-effects models tested time, physical function category, intervention group, and their three-way interaction, adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. Participants had a mean age of 64.2 years (standard deviation 9.2); 92% were female, and mean body mass index was 34.2 kg/m² (standard deviation 7.7). The three-way interaction for chair stands was not significant (P = 0.27). Higher chair-stand performance was associated with more steps/day across follow-up (P = 0.0003). In the high-repetition WWE-T subgroup, steps/day increased at 6 weeks by 731 (95% confidence interval 281 to 1182) and at 6 months by 457 (72 to 843). The three-way interaction for walking endurance was not significant (P = 0.20), though higher walking endurance was associated with more steps/day (P < 0.0001). The presence of limitations with physical function did not moderate changes to steps/day following a telephone‑delivered physical activity intervention, though those without limitations had more steps/day.

Indexed as

ArthritisExerciseExercise TherapyWalkingAccelerometryAgedFemaleFunctional StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelephoneTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWalk TestArthritisPhysical functional performanceTreatment outcomeWalking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.