ReviewDrug delivery2026
Redefining intranasal brain delivery: from nasal entry to meaningful parenchymal and cellular exposure.
Review in Drug delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nose-to-brain (N2B) delivery is a promising noninvasive strategy to circumvent the blood‒brain barrier (BBB). However, the clinical translation of N2B platforms remains hindered by a conceptual oversimplification that equates crude central nervous system (CNS) exposure with effective therapeutic delivery. This review reconceptualizes the N2B pathway as a stage-resolved sequential transport cascade extending from nasal entry to meaningful parenchymal and cellular access. We identify a critical imbalance in current formulation strategies, which have advanced two extreme poles, namely initial mucosal retention and epithelial permeation at one end and final target-cell engagement at the other, while leaving the intermediate post-epithelial gateways, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and perivascular space (PVS)-mediated redistribution and deep intraparenchymal diffusion, as structural and interpretive blind spots. To bridge this gap, we propose an integrated engineering paradigm with three core design principles. First, multistage-aware design harmonizes sequential spatiotemporal functionalities within a single vehicle architecture. Second, disease-informed design integrates pathologically remodeled barrier states and glymphatic hydrodynamics into the formulation rationale. Third, cargo-informed design establishes the distinct biophysical identity and inherent liabilities of each payload, from small molecules to viral vectors and CRISPR machinery, as the primary engineering starting point. Finally, we advocate for a methodological standard demanding stage-specific validation of vehicle integrity, cross-boundary penetration, and functional target engagement, beyond compartment-blind whole-brain readouts. We further underscore the biofate and clearance of delivery systems as an emerging axis of safety and regulatory evaluation. Collectively, this framework provides a systematic basis for transitioning N2B engineering into a viable clinical modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.