Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42820600›Full record

ReviewEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026

Artificial Intelligence in Telemedicine: philosophical, ethical, and epistemological dimensions of a transforming practice.

Agnaldo Rodrigues da Costa, Carlos Henrique Sartorato Pedrotti, Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agnaldo Rodrigues da CostaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2503-1013
Carlos Henrique Sartorato PedrottiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0634-7086
Tarso Augusto Duenhas AccorsiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8023-3466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has evolved from a contingency-based alternative into a structural pillar of healthcare delivery, increasingly being integrated with artificial intelligence. Algorithms for triage, clinical decision support, remote monitoring, and generative language models now actively participate in medical care. This integration is more than just functional; it reorganizes the foundational aspects of medicine-ontological, ethical, and epistemological-by redefining what qualifies as valid knowledge, who has legitimate authority, and how care is organized when an algorithmic agent facilitates the clinical interaction. This article critically examines the emergence of the patient-clinician-algorithm triad in telemedicine, and analyzes its implications for autonomy, informed consent, epistemic trust, privacy, justice, responsibility, and the phenomenology of care. It argues that the future of medicine will not be human or algorithmic but human-algorithmic, provided clinical judgment, explainability, and moral responsibility remain central.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTelemedicineAlgorithmsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID42820600
PMCPMC13689968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.