Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42820526›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2026

Pan filarial-nested PCR with gelified tubes: a new approach towards point-of-care testing for human filariasisFIRST REVIEW ROUND - REVIEWERS' COMMENTSREVIEWERS' COMMENTS.

Raquel Capote-Morales, Agustín Benito, Pedro Berzosa, Vicenta González, Luz García, Alba Sastre-González, Akeem Abiodun Akindele, Olusola Ojurongbe, Thuy-Huong Ta-Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raquel Capote-MoralesInstituto de Salud Carlos III, National Centre of Tropical Medicine, Laboratory for Scientific-Technical Cooperation in Tropical Diseases, Madrid, Spain.
Agustín BenitoInstituto de Salud Carlos III, National Centre of Tropical Medicine, Laboratory for Scientific-Technical Cooperation in Tropical Diseases, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro BerzosaInstituto de Salud Carlos III, National Centre of Tropical Medicine, Laboratory for Scientific-Technical Cooperation in Tropical Diseases, Madrid, Spain.
Vicenta GonzálezInstituto de Salud Carlos III, National Centre of Tropical Medicine, Laboratory for Scientific-Technical Cooperation in Tropical Diseases, Madrid, Spain.
Luz GarcíaInstituto de Salud Carlos III, National Centre of Tropical Medicine, Laboratory for Scientific-Technical Cooperation in Tropical Diseases, Madrid, Spain.
Alba Sastre-GonzálezAlcalá University of Madrid, Faculty of Sciences, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Akeem Abiodun AkindeleLadoke Akintola University of Technology, Medical Laboratory Science Department, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
Olusola OjurongbeLadoke Akintola University of Technology, HRH-Centre for Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
Thuy-Huong Ta-TangInstituto de Salud Carlos III, National Centre of Tropical Medicine, Laboratory for Scientific-Technical Cooperation in Tropical Diseases, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7058-4839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, traditional point-of-care tests (POCTs) for diagnosing human filariasis have demonstrated substantial limitations, raising concerns regarding their reliability in the current epidemiological context, in which numerous countries are approaching the elimination of human filariasis. Consequently, there is a need for new molecular tests that allow the simultaneous and reliable detection of multiple human filarial species, even in cases of very low microfilaremia.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to convert the Fn-PCR from its original manual format to the new gelified tube-filarial-nested polymerase chain reaction (Gel-Fn-PCR), which overcomes some of the disadvantages of traditional molecular techniques thanks to its gelified tube format.

methodsA total of 661 dried blood spots, along with their corresponding stained blood smears, were employed for the optimisation and validation processes. The results of the Gel-Fn-PCR were compared to the microscopic diagnosis.

findingsThe Gel-Fn-PCR demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity for single-species infections (91.6% and 83.0% for Loa loa, and 95.0% and 97.7% for Mansonella perstans, respectively). However, for mixed infections, the sensitivity was low (43.9%), while specificity remained high (99.0%). MAIN

conclusionsThe assay proved to be effective for diagnosing single-species infections, even in cases with very low microfilaremia; however, its performance in identifying mixed infections was reduced, particularly when one species was present in much higher abundance than the other. Although not yet feasible as a fully deployable POCT, this study demonstrates the potential of integrating gelification with PCR for human filariasis diagnosis.

Indexed as

FilariasisPoint-of-Care TestingPolymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsHumansRapid Diagnostic TestsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID42820526
PMCPMC13623295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.