Observational studyDental press journal of orthodontics2026
Knowledge about sucking habits. Elaboration, validation and application of an online questionnaire: an exploratory study.
Observational study in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis exploratory study aimed to assess the population's knowledge about sucking habits (SHs). MATERIAL AND
methodsAn observational study was developed using data collection through an electronic questionnaire, which had previously been elaborated and validated and was sent to the general population (over 18 years of age) through social media and message applications. The validity of the convergent and discriminant construct, reliability, and internal consistency of the data were evaluated in order to validate the questionnaire's acceptability. The influence of sociodemographic factors - being a mother/father and SH history concerning the participants' average knowledge on the issue - was evaluated through linear regression (α=0.05).
resultsThe questionnaire showed good acceptability and discriminating properties (p<0.05), strong construct validity (r=0.62), satisfactory reliability (Cronbach's alpha =0.72), and replicability (ICC=0.89). In total, 294 participants were included and presented an average of 5.21 [± 2.04] correct answers. After linear regression, participants who only worked in health areas and who had only one child continued to present greater knowledge about SHs (p<0.05).
conclusionIt can therefore be concluded that the knowledge of the population concerning SH is insufficient and further studies, as well as strategies for education, guidance, and dissemination of information regarding SHs should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.