Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42820303›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2026

Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: redefining targeted therapy.

Chenxu Guo, Leif W Ellisen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chenxu GuoMass General Brigham Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Leif W EllisenMass General Brigham Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have transformed the treatment landscape of breast cancer and redefined the conceptual distinction between targeted therapy and conventional chemotherapy. Originally conceived as "magic bullets" that selectively deliver cytotoxic warheads to antigen-expressing tumor cells, clinical and mechanistic evidence indicates that ADC activity depends on a broader interplay of target-dependent and target-independent mechanisms, including extracellular payload release, bystander killing, off-tumor uptake, and immune modulation. Here, we examine ADCs in breast cancer as a distinct therapeutic paradigm. We discuss how antigen biology, linker chemistry, payload features, and drug-to-antibody ratio collectively determine efficacy, toxicity, and therapeutic index. We then compare currently approved and emerging HER2- and TROP2-directed ADCs, highlighting how differences in linker stability, payload pharmacology, and bystander capacity can affect clinical outcomes in ADCs sharing the same target. We further discuss the biological basis and translational challenges of de novo and acquired resistance related to targets, payloads, and tumor microenvironmental constraints, as well as the implications of these mechanisms for biomarker development, sequencing rationales, and combination strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors and DNA repair-targeting therapies. Finally, we outline future directions of ADC development, including expansion of the target space, novel payload modalities, and next-generation antibody and conjugation engineering.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsImmunoconjugatesMolecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansAntigens, NeoplasmERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID42820303
PMCPMC13626851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.