ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026
Comparison of bispectral index-guided infusion of propofol, etomidate, and etomidate-propofol combination for supraglottic airway device insertion in paediatric patients: A randomised clinical trial.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The use of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) in paediatrics has considerably increased. Focusing haemodynamics at anaesthetic induction, the study evaluated change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) amongst propofol (P), etomidate (E), and etomidate-propofol combination(etofol, EP) groups at the attainment of bispectral index (BIS) 50 for SAD insertion. Methods: A total of 132 patients of either gender between 6 and 10 years of age were randomly allocated as groups P, E, and EP with Results: ∆MAP was maximum in group P opposed to groups E and EP (9.14 ± 1.5 versus 4.32 ± 0.98 and 4.75 ± 1.50 mmHg, Conclusion: Etomidate-propofol combination (etofol) demonstrated superior haemodynamic stability in BIS-guided paediatric anaesthetic induction, an added advantage to propofol use for ensuring favourable SAD insertion alongside better side-effect profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.