Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42820180›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2026

Capacity for national health policy modelling, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates.

Abdullah Alibrahim, Fadi El-Jardali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdullah AlibrahimDepartment of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, College of Engineering & Petroleum, Kuwait University, PO Box 5969, Safat13060, Kuwait.
Fadi El-JardaliKnowledge to Policy (K2P) Center, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gulf Cooperation Council countries (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates) have similar governance structures, economic profiles and health system organization, creating an opportunity for collective action on health. Similarly, these countries have the same challenges including ageing populations, climate and heat risks, immigration, service delivery and disease profiles. We argue for the need to shift from opinion-driven policy discourse to computer-based, decision-focused policy analysis that is participatory, aware of inherent uncertainties surrounding decisions and context-specific. Despite areas of excellence, modelling capacity in these countries is fragmented and underresourced and models are rarely used to guide decision-making. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic saw very few decision-oriented models tied to local data from Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Gulf Cooperation Council models rely on outside modellers, which limits both the relevance and ownership of the findings. The coming decade will bring challenges that demand a change in how evidence is generated and applied. A structured, regionally anchored policy-modelling system can help governments test reforms, prioritize investments and engage in scenario planning before crises force reactive measures. Our paper outlines pragmatic steps towards effective health policy modelling based on four supporting pillars: (i) a regional co-produced modelling and knowledge translation strategy tied to priority decisions; (ii) embedded capacity-building across ministries, public health institutes and universities; (iii) a viable modelling stack that allows transparency, speed and reproducibility; and (iv) explicit communication and evaluation of the uncertainty of models to reduce risks within the choices made.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PolicyPolicy MakingHumansMiddle EastOmanSaudi ArabiaUnited Arab Emirates

Identifiers

PMID42820180
PMCPMC13626532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.