Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42820096›Full record

ArticleTransactions on machine learning research2026

Scale-Invariant, Robust Sparse PCA for Large Data via Differentiable Penalties.

Manu Aggarwal, Vipul Periwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transactions on machine learning research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manu AggarwalLaboratory of Biological Modeling, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vipul PeriwalLaboratory of Biological Modeling, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DK999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sparse PCA finds low-dimensional structure that loads on few features. Existing methods couple learning and feature selection by applying non-differentiable penalties that force retain-or-zero decisions during optimization. This eliminates features before the optimizer has established which ones matter, limits scalability to serial coordinate-update solvers, and fails when components share support. We introduce DROSS-PCA (Differentiable RObust Scalable Sparse PCA), which decouples learning and feature selection. It learns by optimizing a fully differentiable objective combining robust reconstruction, a smooth sparsity penalty, and an orthogonality term. It selects features post-hoc via cosine-preserving pruning. DROSS-PCA is GPU-accelerated, scaling sparse PCA to large data sets beyond the reach of existing methods. All loss terms are calibrated to be independent of data dimensionality and scale, giving penalty weights consistent meaning across data sets. On synthetic benchmarks, DROSS-PCA matches or outperforms established methods on support recovery. Under outlier contamination it substantially exceeds non-robust methods and remains competitive with dedicated robust methods, which do not scale to large problems. The smooth formulation of DROSS-PCA enables stability analysis via random initializations since no feature is eliminated during training. We find that the method's feature selection is stable when the generating basis is theoretically identifiable and shows increased uncertainty precisely when it is not. On the Human Lung Cell Atlas (584,944 × 27,402), gene selection is 97% consistent across independent random initializations, and consensus gene modules identified from reproducibility across runs are enriched for known biological pathways. On daily sea-surface temperature fields (ERA5, 23,376 × 484,778), the leading sparse mode reproduces the observed El Niño index and the leading modes localize to individual ocean basins.

Identifiers

PMID42820096
PMCPMC13626024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.