ArticleChemical science2026
Enantioselective Rh-catalyzed addition of indoles to enones and the key role of the free N-H group with acyclic enones.
Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The protection of N-H groups is often essential to harness highly valuable metal-catalyzed C-C coupling protocols. However, the avoidance of protecting groups has enormous advantages in terms of atom- and step-economy and can, on occasion, be required. Herein, we report a Rh-catalyzed asymmetric conjugate addition using free N-H indole boronic acids and esters with enones. Excellent yields (up to 96%) and e.r. values (up to >99 : 1) were obtained. Each position on the carbocyclic backbone of the indole is accessible. Two sets of conditions involving two sets of chiral ligands (a chiral sulfinamide (S-ligand) and BINAP) were optimized for cyclic and acyclic enones, respectively. The origin of success and failure for each ligand family was investigated using DFT calculations. For example, the calculations suggested that using the chiral S-ligand and an acyclic enone allows for ligation of two enone units, which scuppers catalytic activity. Secondly, using the BINAP ligand with acyclic enones, specifically at the C7 position of indole, allows for an H-bond between the indole (N-H) and the enone, which is critical for high yields and enantioselectivities. In certain cases, a subsequent one-pot process ensues where the indole product undergoes an intramolecular addition (:NH) to the newly tethered ketone (C[double bond, length as m-dash]O), to form unusual tetracyclic hemiaminals, with two chiral centers. As expected, in cyclic enone systems, the cyclization in step 2 occurs with an excellent d.r. However, remarkably, when flexible acyclic enones are used, excellent d.r. values are retained. DFT calculations were again employed which suggest that both product diastereoisomers are of similar thermodynamic energy values, so a high kinetic barrier is expected. Finally, the methodology was also extended to 1,2-addition reactions to form quaternary centers with excellent e.r.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.