ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Perinatal mental health equity: patient perspectives on virtual collaborative care providing what women need now in the post-COVID era.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic increased perinatal mental health needs and disrupted routine obstetric care, disproportionately affecting Black and economically disadvantaged communities. Michigan's Perinatal Collaborative Care Model (Peri CoCM), a publicly funded virtual program, launched during the pandemic and continued after the public health emergency. This qualitative study examined participant experiences with Peri CoCM, including perceived usefulness, acceptability, and barriers/facilitators to engagement, particularly among marginalized perinatal people to inform post-COVID service delivery. Methods: Eligible participants were pregnant or up to one year postpartum Peri CoCM patients recruited from a May-July 2025 referral cohort. Nine women ages 27-42 completed one-hour, semi-structured Zoom interviews between August and September 2025; the sample intentionally overrepresented self-identified Black women. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, verified against audio, and analyzed by a coding team using grounded-theory-informed thematic analysis with constant comparison. Results: Participants reported positive experiences with Peri CoCM across four thematic areas: (1) Pathways to care, (2) Perceived impacts of program, (3) Importance of culturally responsive care, and (4) Recommendations for program optimization. Trusted referrals from obstetric and other providers facilitated entry into care, often for anxiety, depression, grief, or first-time mental health support. Participants described Peri CoCM as accessible, supportive, and valuable during pregnancy and postpartum. Virtual options, flexible scheduling, compassionate behavioral health clinicians, and consistent follow-up reduced barriers and promoted openness. The short-term model helped some transition to longer-term therapy, while clinicians supported insurance navigation, medication decisions, and community resource connections. Participants gained coping skills, validation, and self-understanding. They emphasized culturally responsive provider fit and recommended longer continuity, broader wraparound services, and sustained no-cost access to reduce stress and improve engagement. Conclusion: Michigan's Peri CoCM was perceived as a low-barrier, relationship-centered, culturally responsive virtual pathway supporting perinatal wellbeing and systems navigation in the post-COVID era. Cost transparency and flexible delivery were central to acceptability and expanded access to equitable care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.