Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42820000›Full record

ArticleChemical & biomedical imaging2026

Quantitative Analysis of Cytoplasmic Viscosity in Colorectal Cancer Cells by Differential Dynamic Microscopy of Genetically Encoded Nanoparticles.

Steven Huysecom, Kiki Schouwstra, Samet Aytekin, Natalie Neyrinck, Yana Heyvaert, Boris Louis, Susana Rocha, Guillermo Solís-Fernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical & biomedical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steven HuysecomMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Kiki SchouwstraMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9577-5226
Samet AytekinMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Natalie NeyrinckMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Yana HeyvaertMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9648-8052
Boris LouisMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2882-6907
Susana RochaMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1258-9396
Guillermo Solís-FernandezMolecular Imaging and Photonics, Chemistry Department, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4785-0040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The viscosity of the cytoplasm plays a key role in regulating molecular diffusion and cellular mechanics, yet quantifying it in living cells remains technically challenging. Genetically encoded multimeric nanoparticles (GEMs) have emerged as useful probes for intracellular microrheology; however, current analyses rely on single-particle tracking, which is limited by probe density, imaging noise, and expression variability. Here, we combine GEMs with differential dynamic microscopy (DDM) to enable quantitative, noninvasive, and rapid measurement of intracellular viscosity using standard wide-field fluorescence imaging. DDM extracts particle dynamics from ensemble spatiotemporal intensity fluctuations, yielding diffusion coefficients and viscosity estimates, even in crowded or heterogeneous environments where tracking fails. Validation with fluorescent nanoparticles diffusing in water confirmed that DDM accurately reproduced theoretical viscosities across a wide range of particle sizes and concentrations. Comparison with single-particle tracking (SPT) demonstrated equivalent precision under dilute conditions and improved the performance under crowding. To showcase the potential of this approach, we applied GEM-DDM to colorectal cancer cell lines with different metastatic potentials. Cytoplasmic viscosity correlated with aggressiveness, increasing from 1.9 to 2.3 cP in poorly metastatic lines to 3.6-3.7 cP in highly metastatic lines, consistent with greater macromolecular crowding and cytoplasmic reorganization reported in aggressive cells. Together, these results establish GEM-DDM as a fast, reproducible, and accessible platform for intracellular microrheology to link the physical state of the cytoplasm to cell function and disease progression.

Indexed as

Cytoplasmic viscosityDifferential dynamic microscopyGenetically encoded nanoparticlesIntracellular microrheologyLive-cell imagingParticle diffusion

Identifiers

PMID42820000
PMCPMC13625701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.