ArticleACS omega2026
Nanoscale Disentangling of Strain and Doping in Monolayer Graphene Grown on Cu-Based Growth Template and Transferred onto Si Substrate by Combining TERS, Raman Correlation Analysis, and PCA.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding and decoupling the effects of strain and doping in graphene remains a central challenge in Raman spectroscopy, as far-field measurements inherently average local variations. In this work, we combine conventional Raman spectroscopy, tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS), G-2D bands correlation analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) to investigate graphene grown on copper (Cu) and transferred onto silicon (Si) substrates, with the aim of probing substrate-dependent spectral variability across different length scales. Far-field Raman measurements show distinct but relatively compact spectral distributions for graphene on Cu and Si, with trends that can be qualitatively associated with mixed strain- and dopinglike contributions. These measurements primarily reflect a spatially averaged response, which masks local variations. In contrast, TERS reveals a significantly broader and spatially heterogeneous spectral behavior, particularly for graphene on Cu, whereas graphene on Si exhibits a more compact distribution. These differences indicate that substrate-dependent interactions and transfer processes influence not only the average spectral response but also its local variability. Correlation analysis based on G-2D trends provides a qualitative framework to identify dominant spectral tendencies, while PCA enables a data-driven description of spectral variability without relying on peak fitting. PCA distinguishes the main substrate-dependent contribution from additional sources of variability and, through spatial mapping of principal components, reveals that these variations are spatially structured at the nanoscale in TERS measurements, whereas Raman maps remain comparatively smooth. Overall, the combined approach demonstrates that TERS does not simply enhance the Raman signal locally but provides access to the distribution of local spectral variations that are averaged out in far-field measurements. This methodology offers a robust framework for the nanoscale investigation of graphene and can be extended to other two-dimensional materials, where local heterogeneity plays a key role in determining macroscopic properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.