ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Bio-banding in football: a scoping review with evidence gap map.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study conducted the first scoping review with evidence gap map (EGM) on bio-banding in football, a field that has received increasing attention. Although previous studies have investigated technical and physical performance, including physiological outcomes, these findings have not yet been comprehensively reviewed. Hence, this review aimed to synthesize the existing evidence, identify research gaps, and inform future research priorities. Methods: This scoping review followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The databases searched were Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and ScienceDirect, and the searches were conducted on 29 January 2026. Eligible studies were original articles published in English or Spanish that investigated bio-banding in youth football players aged 11-15 years, with no restriction on publication year. Data on study characteristics, participant information, and study outcomes were extracted and synthesized to develop the evidence gap map (EGM). Results: A total of 47 records were identified, of which 20 met the selection criteria. Publications on bio-banding have increased markedly in recent years. Technical performance and psychological outcomes were the most frequently investigated themes, whereas no studies examined injury outcomes. The majority of studies involved male players and were conducted in Europe, highlighting the need for research involving female players, stakeholders, and more geographically diverse populations. Conclusion: Bio-banding is a promising strategy for talent identification and player development. Current evidence suggests that it may reduce maturity-related differences while supporting technical, tactical, and psychological development. However, important evidence gaps remain, particularly regarding physiological outcomes, female players, non-European populations, and diverse study designs. These findings provide practical guidance for coaches and practitioners and highlight priorities for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.