ArticleMachine learning : engineering2026
In-process large language model requesting through knowledge graphs for interfacing with manufacturing digital twins.
Article in Machine learning : engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital twins (DTs) have potential to improve manufacturing processes by providing in-process monitoring and reducing trial-and-error while improving process prediction and performance. However, identifying anomalies or defects in a DT environment remains a very time intensive process that requires multidisciplinary expertise and significant manual effort in analyzing the system. Large language models (LLMs) offer potential capabilities to interpret system-level information and support user-driven querying, but their effectiveness is limited by hallucinations when reasoning over large and dynamic manufacturing datasets inherent to process monitoring DTs. Knowledge graphs (KGs) have emerged as efficient tools in the industrial domain to efficiently represent data and their relationships from various disciplines in a structured manner. This paper presents an in-situ framework that integrates structured KGs with LLMs for reliable interaction with an in-process DT of a fused deposition modeling 3D printer. The system retrieves both live telemetry and historical data from the DT during operation to generate context-aware responses to user queries during and after printing in the form of an Information Model that contains the printer information. In addition, the 3D simulation environment of the DT is captured using a Virtual Model that contains geometric information including the collision events and motion command history. The proposed framework was shown to generally outperform Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Live configurations for multiple prints, queries, and LLM versions. The framework demonstrates the potential of KG-integrated LLM integration for improving accessibility, interpretability, and decision support in DT-enabled manufacturing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.