Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42819869›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Ultra-Rapid Cycling Bipolar Disorder: A Case Report.

Shaheen K Kaplan, Jawad Zafar, Kayla Lovejoy

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shaheen K KaplanPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, CUW.
Jawad ZafarDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Farhat Medical Clinic, Beckley, USA.
Kayla LovejoyDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Farhat Medical Clinic, Beckley, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-rapid cycling disorder, in which mood episodes shift over days rather than months, sits at one of the most difficult ends of the bipolar spectrum. It resists standard treatment, tends to worsen with antidepressants, and has very little long-term outcome data to guide clinical decisions. We report the case of a 51-year-old woman whose ultra-rapid cycling bipolar disorder was tracked for 130 weeks. She underwent trials of multiple mood stabilizers, five second-generation antipsychotics, and two courses of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), none of which produced sustained remission. Clozapine brought the most meaningful improvement seen across the entire treatment period but had to be stopped because of sialorrhea and weight gain. The patient described the sialorrhea as feeling like she was drowning in her own saliva, a symptom that, while pharmacologically manageable, was not addressed in time to preserve the treatment. She was subsequently transitioned to long-acting injectable aripiprazole, primarily to address adherence. Ultra-rapid cycling bipolar disorder is genuinely hard to treat, and this case shows what that looks like in practice. Sustained remission may require earlier procedural intervention, more aggressive management of comorbidities, and a willingness to consider agents, including clozapine, that are often reserved as a last resort.

Indexed as

bipolar disorder (bpd)electroconvulsive therapygeneralized anxiety disorder-7patient health questionnaire-9ultra-rapid cycling bipolar disorder

Identifiers

PMID42819869
PMCPMC13625156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.