ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Integrative medicine during antepartum hospitalization: A single-center retrospective pre-post study.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Integrative medicine (IM) therapies are increasingly used alongside conventional medical care to address physical discomfort, stress, sleep disruption, and difficulty relaxing. However, IM remains understudied among hospitalized antepartum patients. We evaluated patterns of IM use and short-term changes in discomfort scores among hospitalized antepartum patients receiving IM consultation. Study design: We conducted a single-center retrospective pre-post study of antepartum patients admitted to a tertiary care center who received at least one IM consultation between January 2024 and July 2025. IM therapies included aromatherapy, meditation and breathwork, sound therapy, and relaxation techniques. Because IM consultations were provided at patient/provider request, the study population reflects patients selected for or interested in IM services rather than all hospitalized antepartum patients. Patient-reported discomfort was assessed immediately before and after each IM encounter by the IM nurse using a five-point ordinal scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating no discomfort and 4 indicating severe discomfort. For patients with multiple IM visits, only one paired pre/post discomfort score was included in the paired analysis, prioritizing the first IM visit with complete pre- and post-intervention discomfort scores. Encounters without both pre- and post-intervention discomfort scores were excluded from paired analysis. Paired scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: A total of 207 antepartum patients received IM consultations during the study period, and 174 patients had paired pre- and post-intervention discomfort scores available for analysis. Mean gestational age at admission was 30 weeks, and median length of stay was 7 days. The most common admission indication was hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (31%). Aromatherapy (94%) and mind-body therapies, including meditation and breathwork (51%), were the most frequently used IM modalities. Median discomfort scores decreased from 2 before IM to 1 after IM ( Conclusion: Among hospitalized antepartum patients who received IM consultation, aromatherapy and mind-body therapies were the most frequently used modalities. IM encounters were associated with short-term reductions in patient-reported discomfort scores; however, given the pre-post design and the absence of a control group, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than causal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.