ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Tocilizumab-associated oral ulcerations: a case report and scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Tocilizumab (TCZ) is an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory disorders. Oral ulcerative events have been described as an infrequently reported and potentially underrecognized effect of TCZ, but their clinical characteristics, frequency, and relationship to treatment remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to map and characterize the available clinical evidence on oral ulcerative events reported during TCZ treatment and to present a clinical case. Materials and methods: A scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies reporting oral ulceration, stomatitis, aphthous ulceration, or related oral mucosal events in adults receiving TCZ were included. A clinical case of recurrent oral ulceration temporally associated with TCZ therapy was also described. Results: Seventeen studies were included, comprising six clinical trials, five observational studies, and six case-report publications. Oral events were variably reported as oral or mouth ulceration, stomatitis, aphthous ulceration, or mucosal ulceration. Detailed information regarding lesion morphology, anatomical distribution, time to onset, duration, and resolution was frequently unavailable, particularly in clinical trials and observational studies. Reported events represented distinct clinical patterns, including newly occurring treatment-emergent events, recurrence following rechallenge, and persistence, lack of therapeutic response, or worsening of pre-existing disease-related ulceration. In the present case, recurrent painful oral ulcerations appeared approximately 24 h after the first TCZ injection and recurred following subsequent doses. Their frequency and severity gradually decreased following multidisciplinary management and subsequent discontinuation of TCZ, with complete resolution reported at the latest follow-up, nine months after TCZ withdrawal. Conclusion: Oral ulcerative events are infrequently reported during TCZ therapy and may be underrecognized; however, the available evidence is heterogeneous and does not establish a uniform clinical phenotype or a definitive causal relationship. Pre-existing disease-related ulceration should be distinguished from newly occurring treatment-emergent events. Careful assessment of temporal relationships, underlying disease, concomitant therapies, and alternative etiologies is important when evaluating oral ulceration in patients receiving TCZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.