ArticlePhysical therapy research2026
Time-updated Prediction of Discharge Functional Independence in Patients with Stroke and Low Functional Independence Measure in a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward: Comparison between Admission and 3-week Models.
Article in Physical therapy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop 2 multiple linear regression models to predict the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score at discharge in patients with stroke and low FIM at admission (total FIM score ≤55) admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation ward, and to compare their predictive accuracy and internal validity. Model 1 used admission assessments only, whereas Model 2 combined admission assessments with reassessment information at 3 weeks after admission. Methods: Participants were 104 patients with stroke admitted with a total FIM score of ≤55. The outcome was the discharge FIM motor score (continuous variable). Candidate predictors included basic information and measures of physical and cognitive function. Models were developed using multiple linear regression, and internal validity was evaluated through bootstrap resampling. In Model 1, predictors were age, days since onset, the Berg Balance Scale, and admission FIM motor and cognitive scores. In Model 2, predictors were age, days since onset, admission FIM cognitive score, and the FIM motor score at 3 weeks after admission. Results: Model 2 showed a higher adjusted R Conclusions: Incorporating reassessment information at 3 weeks improved time-updated prediction of discharge activities of daily living outcomes in this single-center cohort. However, given limited generalizability, external validation using multicenter data (and, if necessary, model updating) is required before broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.