ArticlePhysical therapy research2026
Change in Quality of Life after Rehabilitation in Cambodia among Adults with Lower Limb Amputation.
Article in Physical therapy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to describe the quality of life (QoL) of persons with lower limb amputations (LLAs) in Cambodia both before and after rehabilitation, and to identify predictor variables associated with increased QoL outcomes post-rehabilitation. Methods: A total of 164 participants with LLA from 7 physical rehabilitation centers (PRCs) across Cambodia completed the baseline assessment; however, only 125 participants (58% below- or through-knee amputations; 98% unilateral) completed the 3-month follow-up, with 39 participants lost to follow-up. Participants were interviewed using the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale Adult questionnaire (which includes both objective and subjective scores). Baseline data were collected on the first day of admission at the PRC, following referrals from hospitals after the limb surgery. Follow-up data were gathered 3 months after discharge from rehabilitation. A paired t-test was used to assess the difference in QoL scores, and linear regression identified factors potentially associated with changes in QoL. Results: Our findings indicate that both objective and subjective QoL scores of persons with LLA increased significantly 3 months after rehabilitation (p <0.001). The absence of residual stump pain was significantly associated with higher QoL scores (p = 0.002). In contrast, a longer delay (>12 months) between amputation and receipt of rehabilitation services was associated with a smaller improvement in subjective QoL (p = 0.023). Conclusions: The findings suggest that early rehabilitation after amputation and the inclusion of effective pain management may be associated with better QoL outcomes; however, these approaches should be evaluated through further research to validate their impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.